,

Kubernetes Horror Stories (and What We Learned From Them)

Posted by

☠️ Kubernetes Horror Stories (and What We Learned From Them)

Because what doesn’t kill your cluster makes it stronger.

Kubernetes is powerful — but with great power comes… production outages, accidental deletions, memory leaks, and sleepless nights for DevOps teams.

In this post, we’ll dive into some of the most infamous Kubernetes horror stories from real teams — and extract actionable lessons to make your clusters safer, smarter, and more resilient.


👻 1. The Infinite Pod Spawn: “kubectl apply –force” Gone Wrong

🧟 What Happened:

A junior engineer used kubectl apply --force on a Deployment… but didn’t notice that the YAML had changed from Deployment to Pod.

The result?

  • Kubernetes deleted the existing Deployment
  • And created a single Pod
  • Kubernetes then tried to maintain the old desired state
  • Infinite loop of pod recreations and crashes

💡 What We Learned:

  • Never change kind: Deployment to kind: Pod in production manifests
  • Use kubectl diff before applying
  • Use admission controllers to prevent dangerous kinds
  • Monitor for CrashLoopBackOff status regularly

🔥 2. Outage by Liveness Probe

🧟 What Happened:

A company added a liveness probe that hit a slow endpoint on startup.
During a deployment:

  • The app wasn’t ready yet
  • The liveness probe marked the pod unhealthy
  • K8s killed the pod
  • Repeat… indefinitely

Their entire app never became ready, resulting in an hour-long outage.

💡 What We Learned:

  • Don’t confuse readiness and liveness
    • Readiness = “Can I serve traffic?”
    • Liveness = “Am I alive or should I be restarted?”
  • Add startupProbe for slow starters
  • Test probes locally and in staging with realistic load

⚰️ 3. The “Delete All” Namespace Accident

🧟 What Happened:

An engineer ran:

kubectl delete all --all -n production

Expecting to clean up some leftover resources.

It deleted:

  • Deployments
  • Services
  • Pods
  • ConfigMaps
  • Secrets
    …in production.

💡 What We Learned:

  • NEVER use --all in production without a dry run
  • Implement namespace-level RBAC restrictions
  • Use Opa/Gatekeeper to block accidental wildcards
  • Use --dry-run=client before executing commands

🧊 4. Node Autoscaler Evicted the Wrong Pods

🧟 What Happened:

The cluster autoscaler scaled down nodes…
But it evicted stateful workloads (Kafka, DB pods) not marked with PodDisruptionBudget.

Result:

  • Data corruption
  • Manual restores
  • Loss of customer trust

💡 What We Learned:

  • Always define PodDisruptionBudget (PDB) for stateful sets
  • Use anti-affinity rules to spread stateful pods
  • Annotate critical pods with priorityClassName

🕳️ 5. The Memory Leak That Evaded Metrics

🧟 What Happened:

A service had a memory leak.
But K8s didn’t restart it — because:

  • requests.memory was too high
  • Container never hit memory limits

Instead, it got slower and slower, consuming memory unnoticed.

💡 What We Learned:

  • Don’t over-provision requests and limits
  • Use Prometheus memory usage metrics to catch trends
  • Combine with Grafana alerting for gradual leaks
  • Use oom_score_adj for better out-of-memory handling

🌊 6. The Silent Log Storm

🧟 What Happened:

A debug log line accidentally introduced in a tight loop:

log.Infof("Processing event: %v", event)

What started as a fix ended up:

  • Generating GBs of logs per minute
  • Overwhelming Fluentd
  • Crashing the entire logging pipeline

💡 What We Learned:

  • Limit logging levels in loops
  • Use log sampling or rate limiting in code
  • Cap log volume in Fluentd/Logstash
  • Use Loki with retention policies

💥 7. The Helm Upgrade That Broke Everything

🧟 What Happened:

A Helm chart was upgraded in production without version pinning.
The chart had new defaults:

  • Removed readinessProbe
  • Changed ports
  • Introduced breaking config changes

The upgrade silently passed… but the app failed to serve traffic.

💡 What We Learned:

  • Always pin chart versions
  • Use helm diff upgrade before deploying
  • Use Helm rollback for emergency recovery
  • Run upgrades in canary environments first

🧬 8. The Missing Resource Limit Meltdown

🧟 What Happened:

An app without CPU/memory limits experienced a spike.

It:

  • Consumed all node memory
  • OOM-killed other apps
  • Brought down the node

A single misconfigured pod took down multiple services.

💡 What We Learned:

  • Always define CPU and memory limits
  • Use LimitRanges to enforce resource requests
  • Monitor nodes with Node Exporter / Prometheus
  • Auto-scale pods based on usage (HPA/VPA)

🧠 Final Advice for Sane Kubernetes

Best PracticeWhy It Matters
Use readinessProbe, livenessProbe, and startupProbe properlyPrevents premature killing
Enforce RBAC + least privilegeAvoid namespace-wide disasters
Monitor everything (CPU, memory, logs, latency)Detect issues before users do
Use Helm responsiblyNo blind upgrades
Audit your YAMLsTools like kube-linter help catch mistakes
Protect stateful appsUse PDB, anti-affinity, and volume protection
Validate with kubectl diffPreview changes before applying
Enable resource limitsAvoid noisy neighbor crashes

🎃 Final Thoughts: Fear Kills Clusters. Knowledge Saves Them.

Kubernetes is complex — and complexity means risk.

But every horror story is also a lesson in resilience, automation, and engineering maturity.

Treat your cluster like a garden — not a factory.
Observe it, care for it, prune it, and document everything.

Even in a world of crashes and chaos, Kubernetes can be your most reliable ally — if you respect its power.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x