Data Shuffling

Posted by

Data Shuffling Explained

Data shuffling happens when tasks like joining two datasets, aggregating data, or window operations require data to be moved across different worker nodes in a cluster. This process is resource-intensive and can slow down computations.

Optimization Techniques

Broadcast Hash Join

  • Example: If you have a small customer table and a large sales table, you can broadcast the smaller customer table to all nodes in the cluster. This way, when joining these tables on the customer ID, each node has immediate access to the customer data, avoiding the need to shuffle large amounts of sales data across the network.
  • Code Example in Spark SQL: SELECT /*+ BROADCAST(customers) */ * FROM sales JOIN customers ON sales.customer_id =

Adaptive Query Execution (AQE):

  • Example: If during a join operation Spark detects that one side of the join is smaller than expected (e.g., under 30MB), it can automatically decide to broadcast this smaller dataset instead of performing a more costly shuffle.
  • Spark Configuration: To enable AQE and set the broadcast join threshold to 30MB, you would configure Spark with
set spark.sql.adaptive.enabled = true;
set spark.sql.adaptive.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold = 31457280;

Shuffle Hash Join vs. Sort-Merge Join:

  • Example: Suppose you’re joining two medium-sized datasets where neither is small enough to be broadcast effectively. In cases where a shuffle is unavoidable, a shuffle hash join might be faster than a sort-merge join because it avoids the additional sorting step required by the sort-merge join.
  • Configuration Example: To advise Spark to prefer shuffle hash join over sort-merge join, you can set:
set spark.sql.join.preferSortMergeJoin = false;

Managing Broadcasts:

  • Broadcasting Small Tables: Always use the broadcast hint or the PySpark broadcast function for smaller tables to ensure that they are sent to each node. This can eliminate shuffling and speed up queries.
  • Avoid Large Broadcasts: Never broadcast a table larger than 1GB, as it can overload the network and the driver node, possibly leading to out-of-memory errors or long garbage collection pauses.
  • Example of Overhead Management: If broadcasting a large table (e.g., 200MB in a driver with over 32GB of RAM), adjust your driver settings to handle larger results:
set spark.driver.maxResultSize = 209715200;

In essence, managing data shuffling effectively involves using Spark’s capabilities to minimize unnecessary data movement across the network, using techniques like broadcasting smaller tables and configuring Spark to make smarter decisions about when and how to join datasets.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x